目？？？？錄


粵港澳大灣區(qū)民商事多元糾紛解決機(jī)制相關(guān)問題研究 001
一、非訴訟方面 003
二、訴訟方面 009
《仲裁法》修訂前沿問題探析 013
一、臨時(shí)仲裁制度尚存客觀瓶頸待突破 015
二、仲裁庭自裁管轄權(quán)制度修訂細(xì)節(jié)待商榷 022
三、臨時(shí)措施決定的執(zhí)行效力問題有待解決 025
四、仲裁司法審查機(jī)制有待完善 032
結(jié)　語 039
仲裁司法審查中的價(jià)值選擇問題探析 040
一、問題的提出 040
二、仲裁協(xié)議效力司法審查的價(jià)值選擇 042
三、仲裁裁決司法審查的價(jià)值選擇 053
四、
仲裁司法審查價(jià)值選擇對(duì)有效銜接與協(xié)調(diào)多元化糾紛解決
機(jī)制的實(shí)際功用 058
結(jié)？語 060
最密切聯(lián)系原則納入仲裁協(xié)議法律適用之證成 061
一、最密切聯(lián)系原則與涉外仲裁協(xié)議法律適用之淵源 063
二、隱名適用有效性原則下最密切聯(lián)系原則之新解 065
三、必要性：作為法律選擇理由的最密切聯(lián)系原則 068
四、可行性：最密切聯(lián)系原則與有效性原則互動(dòng)之可能 072
結(jié)　語 074
第三方資助國(guó)際商事仲裁法律問題研究 075
引　言 075
一、第三方資助國(guó)際商事仲裁的內(nèi)涵與發(fā)展 076
二、規(guī)制第三方資助國(guó)際商事仲裁的必要性 078
三、第三方資助國(guó)際商事仲裁的國(guó)際規(guī)制經(jīng)驗(yàn)探究 082
四、第三方資助國(guó)際商事仲裁在中國(guó)的發(fā)展路徑 085
結(jié)　論 091
東北亞仲裁發(fā)展觀察 092
中國(guó)篇 092
一、揚(yáng)帆四海 093
二、改弦更張 093
三、創(chuàng)新與展望 095
俄羅斯篇 095
一、悠久的商事仲裁傳統(tǒng) 096
二、2015年仲裁改革的背景 097
三、現(xiàn)行俄羅斯仲裁法的主要特點(diǎn) 098
四、俄羅斯目前主要的商事仲裁機(jī)構(gòu) 103
五、俄羅斯商事仲裁實(shí)踐中需要注意的幾個(gè)問題 105
蒙古國(guó)篇 110
一、介紹 110
二、現(xiàn)代蒙古國(guó)仲裁法與法律規(guī)制解決 113
三、修訂后的仲裁法 114
結(jié)　語 118
朝鮮篇 119
一、立法背景 120
二、主要內(nèi)容 121
三、對(duì)于朝鮮仲裁管轄權(quán)的思考 127
四、《朝鮮涉外經(jīng)濟(jì)仲裁法》存在的一些問題 131
結(jié)？語 133
韓國(guó)篇 135
一、韓國(guó)仲裁產(chǎn)業(yè)政策導(dǎo)向及現(xiàn)狀 135
二、仲裁產(chǎn)業(yè)化導(dǎo)向下韓國(guó)仲裁法制建設(shè) 140
結(jié)？語 149
日本篇 150
引？言 150
一、日本司法機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)仲裁裁決進(jìn)行司法審查的制度概要 153
二、日本司法機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)仲裁裁決進(jìn)行司法審查的判例運(yùn)用 161
結(jié)？語 165
試論以集團(tuán)公司名義訂立仲裁協(xié)議的效力擴(kuò)張 166
一、基本案情 166
二、問題的提出 167
三、以集團(tuán)公司名義訂立仲裁協(xié)議效力擴(kuò)張的理論適用分析 169
四、我國(guó)以集團(tuán)公司訂立仲裁協(xié)議效力擴(kuò)張的法律制度完善 180
結(jié)　論 184
商事仲裁中逾期提交證據(jù)涉及的若干法律問題研究 185
一、研究逾期提交證據(jù)具有重要意義 186
二、逾期提交證據(jù)與違反仲裁規(guī)則的關(guān)系 188
三、逾期提交證據(jù)，與證據(jù)持有人故意隱瞞證據(jù)（及撤銷裁決
之間）的關(guān)聯(lián)性 193
四、對(duì)于仲裁庭擅自接受一方當(dāng)事人逾期提交的證據(jù)，對(duì)方
當(dāng)事人如何正確應(yīng)對(duì)？ 195
五、關(guān)于逾期提交證據(jù)的立法建議 196

CONTENTS


Studies About Issues Related to the ADR Mechanism on Civil and
Commercial Disputes in the Guangdong-Hongkong-Macao Greater
Bay Area 201
Ⅰ. Non-litigation 204
Ⅱ. Litigation 215
An Analysis of Frontier Issues in the Amendment of Arbitration Law 220
Ⅰ. There are Objective Bottlenecks in the Ad Hoc Arbitration
System to be Broken Through 223
Ⅱ. The Details of the Revision of Competence-Competence Need
to be Discussed 235
Ⅲ. Unresolved Issue of Effectiveness of the Enforcement of
Decisions on Interim Measures 239
Ⅳ. The Judicial Review Mechanism for Arbitration Needs to be Improved 250
Conclusion 261
The Analysis of the Value Option for Judicial Review for Arbitration 262
Ⅰ. Formulation of the Question 263
Ⅱ. Value Options for Judicial Review of the Validity of Arbitration
Agreements 265
Ⅲ. Value Options for Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards 284
Ⅳ. Practical Utility of the Value Choice of Judicial Review of Arbitration for the Effective Articulation and Coordination of Diversified Dispute Resolution Mechanisms 293
Conclusion 296
The Choice of Law of the Arbitration Agreement: New Approach Towards
the Application of the Closest Connection Principle 297
Ⅰ. The Closest Connection Principle as a Source of Choice of
Law for Foreign-related Arbitration Agreements 300
Ⅱ. Noval Framework for Application of the Closest Connection
Principle Under the Hidden Pro-validation Approach 304
Ⅲ. Necessity: the Closest Connection Principle as Basis for Choice
of Laws 308
Ⅳ. Feasibility: Bridging the Validation Principle with the Closest Connection Principle 314
Conclusion 317
Study on the Legal Issues of the Third Party Funding for International Commercial Arbitration 318
Introduction 318
Ⅰ. The Connotation and Development of Third Party Funding for International Commercial Arbitration 319
Ⅱ. Necessity of Regulating Third Party Funding for International Commercial Arbitration 323
Ⅲ. Exploration of International Regulation Experience of Third
Party Funding for International Commercial Arbitration 328
Ⅳ. Development Path of Third Party Funded International
Commercial Arbitration in China 333
Conclusion 342
Observations on the Developments of Arbitration in Northeast Asia 344
China 345
Ⅰ. Worldwide Routes 345
Ⅱ. Setting the Sails 346
Ⅲ. Innovation and Outlook 348
Russia 348
Ⅰ. A Long Tradition of Commercial Arbitration 349
Ⅱ. Background of the 2015 Arbitration Reform 351
Ⅲ. Features of the Arbitration Law of Russian 353
Ⅳ. Current Main Commercial Arbitration Institutions in Russia 359
Ⅴ. Issues to be Noticed in the Practice of Commercial Arbitration
in Russia 363
Mongolia 369
Introduction 369
Ⅰ. Modern Mongolian Arbitration Law and Legal Regulation
Settlement 375
Ⅱ. The Revised Arbitration Law 376
Conclusion 382
Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea 383
Ⅰ. Legislation Background 384
Ⅱ. Main Contents 385
Ⅲ. Reflections on the DPRK Jurisdiction of Arbitration 396
Ⅳ. Problems of the Foreign Economic Arbitration Law of the
DPRK 402
Conclusion 405
Republic of Korea 407
Ⅰ. Industrial Policy Orientation and Current Status of the Arbitration
of Republic of Korea 407
Ⅱ. Legal System Construction of Arbitration of Republic of Korea
Under the Orientation of Arbitration Industrialization 414
Conclusion 429
Japan 430
Introduction 430
Ⅰ. Summary of the Judicial Review System of Arbitral Awards by Japanese Judicial Organs 434
Ⅱ. The Application of Judicial Review in the Judicial Precedents
of Arbitral Awards by Japanese Judicial Organs 447
Conclusion 453
Study on the Expansion of the Validity of Arbitration Agreements
Concluded in the Name of a Group Company 455
Ⅰ. Basic Facts 456
Ⅱ. Problems Raised 457
Ⅲ. Analysis of the Application of Theory to the Expansion of the Validity of Arbitration Agreements Concluded in the Name of
a Group Company 459
Ⅳ. Improvement of the Legal System for the Expansion of the
Validity of Arbitration Agreements Concluded by Group
Company in China 477
Conclusion 483
Studies on the Production of Evidence After the Expiry of the Time Period
in Commercial Arbitration 484
Ⅰ. Significance of Studies on Production of Evidence After the
Expiry of the Time Period 485
Ⅱ. The Relationship Between Producing Evidence After the Expiry
of the Time Period and Violation of Arbitration Rules 489
Ⅲ. The Connection Between the Evidence Produced After the Expiry
of the Time Period and the Deliberate Concealment of Evidence
by the Holder (and Setting Aside the Arbitration Award) 497
Ⅳ. How to Correctly Deal with the Arbitral Tribunals Arbitrary Admission to the Evidence Produced by the Other Party After
the Specified Time Period 499
Ⅴ. Legislative Proposals on Legal Issues concerning Evidence
Produced After the Expiry of the Time Period 501